Federal Reserve Economic Data

The FRED® Blog

Is college still worth it?

Re-examining the college premium

A recent symposium held by the Center for Household Financial Stability at the St. Louis Fed looks at the question of whether the college premium is still increasing and positive, using new data from the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances. On an absolute level, college graduates earn more than high school graduates, as shown in the graph above. This is consistent with the understanding that the benefits of a college education are greater than the costs.

If we look at the college premium, we can see that it has always been positive, indicating that there is a positive benefit of graduating with a bachelor’s degree. This graph shows that, at the end of the first quarter of 2018, college graduates received weekly wages that were 80 percent higher than those of high school graduates.

However, there’s more to this story. Recent research shows that the college premium may or may not be very strong depending on birth year, family, and other inherited characteristics. When looking at the wealth premium instead of just the income premium, the college premium was weak for all races and ethnicities in the 1980s cohorts, whereas the college premium exists for cohorts in earlier decades. A potential reason for this result is the high and rising cost of college. Over the past decade, we see an increase in the dollar amount of total outstanding student loans per total number of college graduates in the labor force, reaching almost $27,000 per college graduate available for work at the end of the first quarter of 2018. High levels of student debt may affect the ability to accumulate wealth, resulting in the declining college wealth premium. This is just one of the reasons for further investigation into the college premium, rising tuition costs, and how education influences economic well-being.

How these graphs were created: For the first graph, search for “wages bachelor’s degree” and select the quarterly data series to add to the graph. From the “Edit Graph” panel, go to “Add Line” and search for “wages high school” and select the corresponding series. To create the second graph, use the same steps to get to the “wages bachelor’s degree” series. Then under the “Customize data” section, search for “wages high school” and select the series. Then enter in the formula (a/b) – 1 to get the college premium. For the third graph, search for “student loans” and select the series for outstanding student loans. From the “Edit Graph” panel, go to “Customize data,” search for “bachelor’s labor force level” to add to the graph. Then in the formula bar, divide line 1 by line 2 and adjust units to show dollars (i.e., enter a/b*1000000).

Suggested by Suvy Qin and Christian Zimmermann.

View on FRED, series used in this post: LEU0252917300Q, LEU0252918500Q, LNS11027662, SLOAS

The rise (and fall?) of the cost of education

Education inflation appears to be converging with general inflation, at least for now

For many years, the cost of education has risen steadily and significantly more than the general level of prices. This trend has led to numerous complaints that education is out of reach; it has also led to a boom in student loans. The graph clearly shows how education inflation (blue line) has been above general inflation (red line) every year since 1994. And, again, quite significantly so. The past few observations, however, exhibit a marked reversal, with one observation even showing CPI inflation higher than education inflation. Does this mean education will become relatively more affordable now? It’s difficult to say from current data, especially since there have been two other episodes, in 2008 and 2011, when the two series converged only to diverge again. Time will tell if this latest development is pomp or circumstance.

How this graph was created: Search for “CPI Education” and create the graph. From the “Edit Graph” section, under “the Add a Line” option, search for and select CPI. Choose units “Percent Change from Year Ago” and click on “Copy to All.”

Suggested by Christian Zimmermann.

View on FRED, series used in this post: CPIAUCSL, CUUR0000SAE1

How different generations accumulate wealth

Net worth at various stages of life

The FRED Blog has discussed how household wealth increases and decreases when the values of financial assets and housing assets go up and down. It’s useful to also consider the concept of net worth, which is the difference between the value of your assets and the value of your liabilities. Our question today is, What impact does age have on the net worth of households?

The FRED graph above uses data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Survey to track the net change in total assets and liabilities (i.e., net worth!) of six different age groups, from under age 25 to age 65 and over.

The data are plotted in stacked bars to show how changes in net worth differ across these age groups and how business cycles affect every group’s wealth. For example, those aged 25 to 34 (red bars) most frequently report decreases in net worth: At this age, the value of student, consumer, and mortgage loans tends to grow faster than the value of the underlying assets.

The observations in this data set don’t allow us to examine how different generations of these age groups have grappled with wealth accumulation, but recent research does. Victoria Gregory and Kevin Bloodworth at the St. Louis Fed explore how Baby Boomers, Generation Xers, and Millennials have balanced student loan debt and homeownership debt to accumulate wealth. Here’s what they found for the college-educated: Millennials and Generation Xers earn as much as Boomers did, but the larger amount of student loan debt the two younger generations carry can reduce their ability to own a home and, thus, accumulate wealth.

For more about this and other research, visit the website of the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, which offers an array of economic analysis and expertise provided by our staff.

How this graph wase created: Search FRED for and select “Net Change in Total Assets and Liabilities by Age: Under Age 25.” From the “Edit Graph” panel, use the “Add Line” tab to search for and add the other five series. To save yourself some time, simply replace the age group after the colon with: “from Age 25 to 34,” “from Age 35 to 44,” “from Age 45 to 54,” “from Age 55 to 64,” and “Age 65 or over.” Last, use the “Format” tab to change the graph type to “Bar” and the stacking option to “Normal.”

Suggested by Diego Mendez-Carbajo.



Subscribe to the FRED newsletter


Follow us

Back to Top