Federal Reserve Economic Data

The FRED® Blog

Timing the market for tax purposes

Realizing capital gains when tax rates are lower

If you’re a U.S. resident, you’ve probably already filled out your tax forms. (Unless you like procrastinating. In which case, you’ve got one month left.) FRED has plenty of data from the Internal Revenue Service that describe tax filings. Some series count the number of individuals filing and the amounts in various parts of their tax declarations. This graph shows the number of people declaring net capital gains. Clearly, the number decreased significantly when the stock market was doing poorly, but it was far from zero: The troughs were about half of the peaks. The reason is that only realized capital gains are taxed—that is, when a stock is sold. Even during the worst times, many of those selling their stocks were still realizing gains compared with the prices of the stocks when they originally bought them. And timing the sale of stocks may be to a taxpayer’s advantage if it allows him or her to benefit from lower marginal tax rates. Similarly, a prolonged stock market rally doesn’t necessarily translate into immediate additional capital gains…unless people sell their stocks during the rally. But periods of high income for taxpayers may not be the right time to sell stock if it pushes them into higher tax brackets.

How this graph was created: Search for “individual income tax filing” and click on the desired series.

Suggested by Christian Zimmermann.

View on FRED, series used in this post: NCGAGI

From floor plans to roof tiles

The stages of putting up new houses for sale

FRED has a lot of data on the real estate market at the regional, national, and international levels; and this graph offers a sample. Here we examine the stage of construction for new houses for sale in the U.S. Indeed, you can buy a house while it’s still in the planning stage, while it’s being constructed, or after it’s completed. Generally, most new houses are put up for sale while construction is still going on. The business cycle can affect this timing, however, and there are a few perspectives to consider.

During a downturn, when houses are more difficult to sell, the stock of completed houses for sale can build up. Also, if prospects for selling a house worsen, a builder may delay construction until a sale is made, which would increase the stock of unstarted houses for sale. On the other hand, a builder may simply abandon the idea of new construction if there are too many finished houses already on the market, decreasing the stock of unstarted houses for sale. This last story seems to apply well to the recent past. In fact, during the previous recession, the number of unstarted houses decreased.

How this graph was created: Search for “new houses for sale by stage” and select the three series. Click on “Add to Graph.” From the “Edit Graph” section, open the “Format” panel to change the graph type to “Bar” with regular stacking.

Suggested by Christian Zimmermann.

View on FRED, series used in this post: NHFSEPCS, NHFSEPNTS, NHFSEPUCS

Of places and patents

Tracking changes in the geography of U.S. innovation

The first U.S. patents were granted over 225 years ago, with three granted in 1790 according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Since then, these exclusive rights for inventions have become much more common and have expanded to cover a greater variety of inventions. In 2015, nearly 300,000 U.S. inventions received patents. The growth in patents has gone hand in hand with growth in innovation, but its geographic distribution has varied over time and continues to change.

The map above shows the number of patents assigned in U.S. counties for the month of October 2016. The counties with more patents (shown by darker colors) tend to be clustered around urban centers such as Los Angeles, Phoenix, Denver, Miami, and Chicago. This distribution could be due to the higher population density in these urban counties—that is, more patents may occur simply because there are more residents. Many of these cities are also home to universities that promote research and development in technology.

Regional patent approvals can rise and fall, and some regions can surpass others. The graph above shows monthly patent approval numbers for a specific geographical region that includes Los Angeles County and nearby Santa Clara County, colloquially known as Silicon Valley. Patents in Silicon Valley began to surpass those in Los Angeles as early as 2001. The graph below (of patents per capita) shows that population growth in Santa Clara County was not the cause of its spike in patent approval. The number of patents per thousand residents was nearly identical in both counties in the early 1980s, but now Silicon Valley’s is 15 times higher than Los Angeles’s.

What explains the rise of one county’s innovation over its neighbor’s? Silicon Valley has been a leader in technological development since the early 20th century thanks to its longstanding location for (i) U.S. Navy research, (ii) Stanford University and its graduates’ jobs in computer production, and (iii) robust venture capital investment. Since about 1995, however, Internet-based firms in Silicon Valley (Google, Apple, Amazon…) have been propelled to the forefront of the tech economy. The types of inventions these companies produce, such as software processes, have been covered by patent law only fairly recently. As these companies gained prominence and profit, the number of patents they were granted increased as well and the trends seen in these graphs came to light.

NOTE: We did notice the steep drop in Santa Clara County’s patent approvals over the past six data points. It is likely due to the time it takes to grant a patent, currently averaging 24 months. Washington, DC, has a similar drop-off in new patent assignments.

How these graphs were created: The original post referenced an interactive map from our now discontinued GeoFRED site. The revised post provides a replacement map from FRED’s new mapping tool. To create FRED maps, go to the data series page in question and look for the green “VIEW MAP” button at the top right of the graph. See this post for instructions to edit a FRED map. Only series with a green map button can be mapped. For the first graph, search FRED for “patents Los Angeles” and select the relevant series. From the “Edit Graph” section, under the “Add Line” tab, search for and select “patents Santa Clara.” Change the frequency of both series to “Quarterly.” To transform the first graph into the second: For the Los Angeles series, use the “Edit Line 1” option in the “Edit Graph” section to search for “population Los Angeles” in the “Customize Data” search bar. Select that series and click “Add.” In the formula bar, write a/b and click “Apply.” Repeat this process with Line 2, searching for “population Santa Clara.”

Suggested by Maria Hyrc, Diego Mendez-Carbajo, and Katrina Stierholz.

View on FRED, series used in this post: CALOSA7POP, CASANT5POP, USPTOISSUED006037, USPTOISSUED006085


Back to Top