Federal Reserve Economic Data

The FRED® Blog

Fourth large-scale asset purchases program: A new hope

We’ve previously discussed the tapering of the three large-scale asset purchase programs popularly known as “quantitative easing.” On Sunday, March 15, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) brought back this unconventional monetary policy tool. The FOMC directed the New York Fed’s Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk) to purchase at least $500 billion worth of Treasury securities and at least $200 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities. These asset purchases are called unconventional policy measures to distinguish them from the management of the federal funds rate through open market sales and purchases of short-term Treasury securities.

The graph above shows the purchase programs started on November 2008, November 2010, and September 2012. Each program had different sizes, which depended on the monetary policy projections, and their impact on the composition of the Federal Reserve System balance sheet can be seen as three distinctive increases in the levels of mortgage-backed securities (the green area), Treasury securities (the blue area), and federal agency debt (the red area).

Research by Michael Kiley has shown that when the federal funds rate target range is at the zero lower bound, large-scale asset purchases can boost economic activity. To assess the relative size of the recently announced fourth large-scale asset purchase program, hover over the right-hand-side of the graph and compare the amounts of the planned purchase of each type of asset with their current (as of March 11) level, which is in the trillions of dollars. And, in the words of Obi-Wan Kenobi: “May the Force be with you.”

How this graph was created: Search for “Assets: Securities Held Outright: U.S. Treasury Securities” and select the “All: Wednesday Level” series (FRED series ID TREAST). From the “Edit Graph” panel, use the “Add Line” feature to search for and select the “Assets: Securities Held Outright: Federal Agency Debt Securities: All: Wednesday Level” series (FRED series ID FEDDT). Do the same to add the series “Assets: Securities Held Outright: Mortgage-Backed Securities: Wednesday Level” (FRED series ID WSHOMCB). From the “Format” tab, select “Area” for graph type and “Normal” for stacking.

NOTE: Simultaneous to the publication of this blog post, the FOMC issued a statement further expanding its tool set to address current economic challenges.

Suggested by Diego Mendez-Carbajo.

View on FRED, series used in this post: FEDDT, TREAST, WSHOMCB

Tracking the U.S. economy and financial markets during the COVID-19 outbreak

Use FRED dashboards to monitor the economy

Financial FRED dashboard Economic FRED dashboard

To help FRED users navigate the rapidly changing economic and financial environment, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has assembled two dashboards of FRED graphs. The first dashboard collects higher-frequency financial market variables. The second dashboard collects mostly monthly indicators that track expenditures, employment and unemployment, and key business and consumer surveys.

For some background on why and how economists and other analysts track economic and financial variables during stressful times, read on:

The World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus—known as COVID-19—a pandemic. Johns Hopkins University is monitoring the spread of the virus and mapping the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases and fatalities worldwide.

The number of confirmed cases in the United States is rising, and U.S. financial markets have been tumultuous. For example, since hitting an all-time high on February 12, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen by about 33 percent as of the writing of this post. Yields on 10-year Treasury securities plunged to an all-time low of 0.54 percent on March 9, though they have since rebounded modestly. Other key financial market indicators, such as commercial paper yields and yields on corporate bonds, have also exhibited stress. Financial market–based measures of inflation expectations have fallen sharply.

These financial market stresses have triggered numerous policy responses by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), including two reductions in the FOMC’s federal funds target rate.

Clearly, the COVID-19 outbreak is a significant and rare event in U.S. history. It has led to widespread disruptions in economic activity, with an unknown duration and magnitude. But it can be characterized and monitored as an economic shock. So, economists and policymakers are monitoring key cyclically sensitive indicators such as initial claims for unemployment insurance, changes in employment, retail sales, and sales of light motor vehicles and new and previously sold (existing) homes.

During times of high and rising uncertainty, financial market variables often serve as reliable forward-looking signals of future economic conditions in the broader economy. A key example is the Treasury yield curve, which usually inverts prior to recessions. This forward-looking perspective is important because most of the important “real” data that economists and policymakers monitor—such as the unemployment rate or industrial production—are backward-looking. For example, the payroll employment numbers for March 2020 will be released on Friday, April 3. However, they will capture only payrolls for the survey week ending March 12. Labor market conditions could have changed dramatically since then, given the fast-moving nature of the COVID-19 outbreak and the responses by firms and the government. To get a more timely measure of labor market conditions, an analyst might instead look at the weekly initial claims data.

Our two new FRED dashboards collect these useful variables to help you monitor and better understand the trajectory of the economy and the state of financial markets. FRED account holders can create their own dashboards, either from scratch or by taking these two as starting points.

Suggested by Kevin Kliesen.

Population and income disparity in the St. Louis MSA

Comparing St. Louis City and MSA population growth

FRED lives at the St. Louis Fed, which is in St. Louis City, which is adjacent to St. Louis County, which are all part of the St. Louis metropolitan statistical area (MSA).* Population and income vary widely across the region, so let’s see what FRED’s Census data can show us.

The graph above shows population for St. Louis City in red (left axis) and the entire St. Louis MSA in blue (right axis).

The city’s population is less than half of what it was 50 years ago: down from 622,236 in 1970 to 302,838 in 2018. The most drastic population declines were in the early 1970s and right after the Great Recession. Despite some steadiness in the 2000s, the city’s population has consistently fallen.

The MSA’s population also declines in the early 1970s, but it stabilizes in the next decade and then steadily increases at a rate of about 0.5% per year. The Great Recession chipped away at MSA population, but soon it stabilized. Its recent growth is way below the previous trend, but the MSA’s overall population has grown by about 10% over the past 50 years.

Comparing St. Louis MSA and U.S. population growth

Overall growth of the St. Louis MSA is actually dwarfed by national population growth and growth in other regions. U.S. population grew by 60.7% from 1970 to 2018. St. Louis is now the 20th largest MSA, a far cry from its standing in 1970, when it was 10th largest.

Comparing St. Louis City and County median income

The graph above shows St. Louis median income relative to U.S. median income for 1998-2018. St. Louis County’s relative median household income is in blue (left axis), and St. Louis City’s relative median household income is in red (right axis).

St. Louis County income is consistently above the U.S. median—initially by a large margin, almost 30% in 1998. St. Louis City income is consistently below the U.S. median—always in the range of 28% to 37%. This income disparity isn’t surprising for St. Louis area residents, who are aware of the wealthy county neighborhoods west of the city (e.g., Clayton, Frontenac, Ladue, Town and Country) and the poor neighborhoods in the city itself (e.g., Hyde Park, Fairground, North Riverfront).

How these graphs were created: First graph: Search for St. Louis resident population and select the city series. From the “Edit Graph” panel, use “Add a Line” to search for and select St. Louis MSA population. Second graph: Search for “Estimate of Median Household Income” and select the St. Louis county series. From the “Edit Graph” panel, use “Add a Line” to search for and select the St. Louis city series. With the “Format” tab, select and in each line add “Median Household Income in the United States.” Using the box for changing the formula, use “a/b” and click enter. For both: Use the “Format” tab to select the right axis for one series and adjust color and line thickness to your liking.

*The St. Louis MSA includes, beyond St. Louis City and County, the Missouri counties of Crawford, Franklin, Jefferson, Lincoln, St, Charles, and Warren and the Illinois counties of Bond, Calhoun, Clinton, Jersey, Macoupin, Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair.

Suggested by Alexander Monge-Naranjo.

View on FRED, series used in this post: MEHOINUSA646N, MHIMO29189A052NCEN, MHIMO29510A052NCEN, MOSSPOP, STLPOP


Back to Top