FRED will undergo scheduled maintenance on May 12 at 4 PM Central Time. Connection to some features may be unavailable. Thank you for your patience and we apologize for any inconvenience.

Federal Reserve Economic Data

The FRED® Blog

Have corporate profits soared?

In this post, we explore trends in corporate profits, which provides a summary measure of firms’ financial health and can help us gauge the overall performance of the economy. When contrasted with measures of aggregate income, they provide an overview of how income is distributed.

The FRED graph above shows quarterly data on corporate profits from the US national income and product accounts (NIPA) published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Corporate profits (with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments) totaled $3.1 trillion in the third quarter of 2024. That’s a significant increase relative to 2019, when corporate profits were $2.2 trillion, and relative to 2010, when they were $1.6 trillion. This increase might reflect an increase in firms’ market power. Although corporate profits have doubled since the end of 2010, so did national income.

Corporate profits in terms of national income have trended upward since the COVID-19 pandemic, but the increase is less spectacular than the nominal value would suggest. Profits have now stabilized at around 15.7% of national income; they were 14.4% of national income in 2010 and 13.6% in 2019.

How does the share of corporate profits compare with the shares of other components of national income? The FRED graph above shows the shares of the four major components of national income*:

  1. compensation of employees (green dashed, right axis)
  2. corporate profits (red solid, left axis)
  3. taxes on production and imports net of subsidies (purple dotted, left axis)
  4. proprietors’ income (orange dashed, left axis)

(Admittedly, the graph is quite crowded, so here’s a link to the same graph without legends.)

The compensation of employees as a fraction of national income is the mirror image of corporate profits, i.e., it tends to go up when corporate profits go down. Despite the uptick during the pandemic, the compensation of employees is back to pre-pandemic levels, at 62% of national income. In contrast, taxes net of subsidies as a fraction of national income went in the opposite direction. They collapsed during the pandemic and are now back at their historical level, at 8%. Proprietors’ income has been stable over the past few years, also accounting for 8% of national income.

*National income’s 7 components:

  1. compensation of employees: wages, salaries, and employer contributions for pension funds
  2. proprietors’ income: income of self-employed individuals and unincorporated business owners
  3. rental income from housing, land, and natural resources
  4. corporate profits
  5. net interest payments: the difference between interest received and interest paid
  6. taxes on production and imports, e.g., customs duties and excise, property, and sales taxes
  7. smaller-value items: e.g., government subsidies, surplus of government enterprises, and business current transfer payments

How this graph was created: In FRED, search for “Corporate Profits” and select “Corporate Profits with Inventory Valuation Adjustment (IVA) and Capital Consumption Adjustment (CCAdj) (CPROFIT)” from the search results. Click on the “Edit Graph” button and use the “Edit line” tab to search for “NICUR” or “national income” in the “Customize data” section. In the “Formula” section below, type in 100*(a/b) to get corporate profits as a fraction of national income. Use the “Add Line” tab to find and add the series “National Income: Compensation of Employees, Paid (COE),” “Proprietors’ Income with Inventory Valuation Adjustment (IVA) and Capital Consumption Adjustment (CCAdj) (PROPINC),” and “Taxes on production and imports less subsidies (W254RC1Q027SBEA).” To make these time series a fraction of national income, use the “Edit line” tab to repeat the steps for corporate taxes above.

Suggested by Ricardo Marto.

The federal budget balance as a fraction of GDP

Tracking data from two sources with two different calendars

The FRED Blog has discussed how many weekdays there are per month, quarter, and year. (It may seem trivial, but when you work with data, you need to be precise about federal and local holidays and how weekends shake out in a given month.)

Today, we consider two data sources, each with its own calendar year.

The FRED graph above shows the balance of the federal government budget as a percent of GDP. To calculate the budget balance, we subtract the value of federal net outlays from the value of federal receipts. Because those receipts and outlays change with the overall level of economic activity, we divide their difference by GDP and multiply by 100 to show it at as annual percentage.

And here’s the rub: Federal receipts and net outlays are reported by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the fiscal year, which runs from October of the previous year to September of the current year. But GDP is reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) for the calendar year, which—just to make sure we’re on the same page—runs from January to December. So each organization counts 12 months for each year but starts counting on different dates.

If you want to learn more, keep on reading…

The second FRED graph shows the annual balance of the federal government budget as a percent of GDP using both calendars: Data from the fiscal year is in red, and data from the calendar year is in blue. The lines are very similar in value, meaning that the use of two different calendars has a small impact on the calculation overall. Small though it may be, the difference is largest for the calendar year at the end of a recession. At that time, the automatic stabilizers of fiscal policy have widened the gap between federal revenues and outlays while GDP is starting to rebound.

How these graphs were created: For the first graph, search for and select “Federal Receipts.” From the “Edit Graph” panel, use the “Edit Line 1” tab to customize the data by searching for and selecting “Federal Net Outlays” and “Gross Domestic Product (GDPA).” Next, create a custom formula to combine the series by typing in (((a-b)/1000)/c)*100 and clicking “Apply.”
For the second graph, from FRED’s main page, browse data by “Release.” Search for ”Debt to Gross Domestic Product Ratios” and check the two boxes under “Federal Surplus or Deficit [-] as Percent of Gross Domestic Product.” Last, click “Add to Graph.”

Suggested by Diego Mendez-Carbajo, Maria Arias, and Chris Russell.

View on FRED, series used in this post: FYFR, FYFSDFYGDP, FYFSGDA188S, FYONET, GDPA

Trade between the U.S. and China: Steady as she goes?

For years now, we’ve been talking about the tempest of tariffs and trade wars between the U.S. and China. The FRED graph above doesn’t reveal all the effects, but it gives us the big picture by tracking overall imports, exports, and the trade balance for goods. Clearly, U.S.-China trade has grown tremendously over the decades, along with a large trade surplus for China. But things haven’t changed in any substantial way for the past 10 years. The composition of traded goods today may be different from what it used to be, but there’s nothing remarkable happening in the aggregate.

A few more ideas:

  1. The units for imports and exports are in natural logarithms, which we’ve used before to evenly display changes over time.
  2. FRED has data only for traded goods, not services; but we did investigate this topic a while back.
  3. There’s nothing intrinsically bad about the U.S. having a trade deficit.

How this graph was created: Search for and select the “goods imports China” series and click “Add to Graph.” From the “Edit Graph” panel, use the “Add Line” option to search for and add the “good exports China” series. Set the units for both lines to “Natural Log.” For the third line, use “Add Line” again to search for and select the “good imports China” series. Then use the “Customize data” search field to search for and select the “good exports China” series. Apply formula b-a. Finally, use the “Format” tab to choose “Right” for the y-axis position of the last line.

Suggested by Christian Zimmermann.

View on FRED, series used in this post: EXPCH, IMPCH


Subscribe to the FRED newsletter


Follow us

Back to Top